Carnassial microwear and dietary behaviour in large carnivorans

By B. Schubert, P. Ungar, L. Desantis. 2010

109 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Anthropology, Ecology, Paleontology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b6fdc82e977e2ac6cddf8603600f6a9c0aeee558

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Anthropology

1. J. Scott

In Ecology

1. J. Scott

In Paleontology

1. J. Scott

Citations in the corpus

• Mammalian dental function and wear: A review (2015, unknown): “Microwear texture analysis has already been applied to a very broad range of mammals, from rabbits [169] to bats [167], shrews [170], antelopes [171 – 173], bears [174], armadillos and sloths [175], dogs, hyenas, and cats [176 – 179], primates, and even marsupials [180].”
• Dental microwear texture analysis of extant African Bovidae (2012, background): “…al. 2005, 2006, 2009 , Ungar et al. 2008a,b, 2010; Ungar et al. in press , Krueger and Ungar 2009 , Merceron et al. 2009 , Prideaux et al. 2009 , Ungar and Scott 2009 , Schubert et al. 2010 , Schulz et al. 2010 ) and to detect differences in diet by season and even gender (Merceron et al. 2010 ).”