Disgust: The Body and Soul Emotion

By P. Rozin, Jonathan Haidt, C. McCauley. 2005

280 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b6f95a423886a622df3d4643c8bf80abb0025c7a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize (2007, background): “Those who seem ruled by carnal passions (lust, gluttony, greed, and anger) are seen as debased, impure, and less than human, while those who live so that the soul is in charge of the body (chaste, spiritually minded, pious) are seen as elevated and sanctified (Haidt, 2006; Rozin et al., 1999; see al”
DISGUST: CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES, SOCIAL MANIFESTATIONS, AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS (2005, background): “By promoting realistic exposure to disgust stimuli (e.g., eating soup from a thoroughly cleaned but used dog bowl), researchers may begin to obtain a better understanding of those individual differences in what people perceive to be threat–relevant (Rozin et al., 1999).”
Disgust, creatureliness and the accessibility of death-related thoughts (2007, background): “…of this research, Rozin and colleagues suggest that since humans are the only species that are cognitively aware of their own death, that distancing the self from animals by expressions of disgust may provide a symbolic way for people to deal with their mortality concerns (Rozin et al., 1999).”
Fear and Compassion: A Terror Management Analysis of Emotional Reactions to Physical Disability. (2005, background): “Encounters between nondisabled people and people with physical disabilities have been aptly depicted by Siller et al. (1967) as “interaction strain” and by Livneh (1980) as “approach–avoidance conflict,” reflecting the tension between the attraction that nondisabled people may feel toward people wit”