Machine learning prediction in cardiovascular diseases: a meta-analysis
By Chayakrit Krittanawong, H. H. Virk, S. Bangalore, Zhen Wang, Kipp W. Johnson, R. Pinotti, Hongju Zhang, Scott L. Kaplin, B. Narasimhan, T. Kitai and 3 more. Scientific Reports, 2020
412 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Several machine learning (ML) algorithms have been increasingly utilized for cardiovascular disease prediction. We aim to assess and summarize the overall predictive ability of ML algorithms in cardiovascular diseases. A comprehensive search strategy was designed and executed within the MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases from database inception through March 15, 2019. The primary outcome was a composite of the predictive ability of ML algorithms of coronary artery disease, heart failure, stroke, and cardiac arrhythmias. Of 344 total studies identified, 103 cohorts, with a total of 3,377,318 individuals, met our inclusion criteria. For the prediction of coronary artery disease, boosting algorithms had a pooled area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88 (95% CI 0.84–0.91), and custom-built algorithms had a pooled AUC of 0.93 (95% CI 0.85–0.97). For the prediction of stroke, support vector machine (SVM) algorithms had a pooled AUC of 0.92 (95% CI 0.81–0.97), boosting algorithms had a pooled AUC of 0.91 (95% CI 0.81–0.96), and convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithms had a pooled AUC of 0.90 (95% CI 0.83–0.95). Although inadequate studies for each algorithm for meta-analytic methodology for both heart failure and cardiac arrhythmias because the confidence intervals overlap between different methods, showing no difference, SVM may outperform other algorithms in these areas. The predictive ability of ML algorithms in cardiovascular diseases is promising, particularly SVM and boosting algorithms. However, there is heterogeneity among ML algorithms in terms of multiple parameters. This information may assist clinicians in how to interpret data and implement optimal algorithms for their dataset.
Subfields: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b6ef8dc54644d1d04623936d68864aeb484289bf
Citations in the corpus
- Causal machine learning for predicting treatment outcomes (2024, neutral): “Second, at the outcome level, causal ML can help make personalized estimates of treatment effects for subpopulations or even predict outcomes for individual patients 2 .”