Natural and imposed injustices: the challenges in implementing 'fair' flood risk management policy in England
By Clare L. Johnson, E. Penning‐Rowsell, D. Parker. 2007
202 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Finance, Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b6e50fa138ccf42d658e2b1cc486c69841121759
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Finance
In Global and Planetary Change
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Review Article: Economic evaluation of flood damage to agriculture – review and analysis of existing methods (2013, background): “We also want to alert that, covering all the impacts of floodplain restoration is very complex because of the entangled issues of food security (Morris, 1992; Posthumus et al., 2010), biodiversity (Rouquette et al., 2009) and equity of damage distribution (Johnson et al., 2007a).”
- Flood recovery and property acquisition in Cedar Rapids, Iowa (2016, background): “…for HMGP project selection increasingly aligns with demands of policy makers and decision-makers (Shreve and Kelman 2014), adopting a utilitarian perspective to disaster recovery in which resource distribution should focus on maximizing public utility (Johnson et al. 2007; Schulze and Kneese 1981).”
- Are homeowners willing to adapt to and mitigate the effects of climate change? (2012, background): “In “Making Space for Water”, the government (DEFRA 2004) emphasised a change to the flood risk management paradigm away from a previously state-centred approach towards one in which other organisations and individuals take a more prominent role (Johnson and Priest 2008).”
- Justice and flood risk management: reflecting on different approaches to distribute and allocate flood risk management in Europe (2016, background): “The key objective is to avoid favouring high-value assets and areas within the country when selecting flood risk management strategies (Johnson et al. 2007).”
- Coproducing flood risk management through citizen involvement: insights from cross-country comparison in Europe (2016, background): “Whereas France is still strongly rooted in a legal tradition providing “equal treatment for all” (Rothstein et al. 2013), Johnson et al. (2007) found the efforts of the government of the United Kingdom to stimulate coproduction in FRM were clearly inspired by an utilitarian perspective.”