The Structural Turn and the Limits of Antidiscrimination Law
By Samuel R. Bagenstos. 2006
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Suresh Venkatasubramanian
- Anna Lauren Hoffmann
- Sorelle A. Friedler
- Andrew D. Selbst
- D. boyd
- Janet Vertesi
- Inioluwa Deborah Raji
- Reuben Binns
Citations in the corpus
- Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems (2019, background): “Though law should not ultimately be our yardstick because it regularly fails to adequately incorporate ideas about discrimination that are accepted by sociology [8] or behavioral psychology [46, 51], even existing law relies on the deeply contextual nature of the question, with differences depending”
- Where fairness fails: data, algorithms, and the limits of antidiscrimination discourse (2019, background): “It is important to note that, despite these limitations, our understanding of structural and other conditions that contribute to discrimination has improved greatly in recent decades, in part a result of what Samuel Bagenstos (2006) calls ‘ the structural turn ’ in antidis-crimination scholarship (p”