A panel study of nuclear energy consumption and economic growth

By N. Apergis, James E. Payne. 2010

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b6a9f6f4528e013256f7c7c1bda44b412db72f3a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

Clean energy, non-clean energy, and economic growth in the MIST countries (2014, background): “08% is lower in Mexico relative to both the 16 country panel (Apergis and Payne, 2010) and the 6 country panel (Lee and Chiu, 2011).”
Nuclear energy consumption, oil prices, and economic growth: Evidence from highly industrialized countries (2011, methodology): “To improve the problem of the omission variable bias and based on the production function, Apergis and Payne (2010), Wolde-Rufael (2010), Wolde-Rufael and Menyah (2010), Payne and Taylor (in press), and Wolde-Rufael (in press) incorporate capital and labor inputs to examine the causal relationship…”
Modeling the causal linkages between nuclear energy, renewable energy and economic growth in developed and developing countries (2015, unknown): “[15] for a panel of 19 developed and developing countries and in line with the short-run causality found by Apergis and Payne [16] for a panel of 16 developped and newly developing countries.”
Measuring the impact of alternative and nuclear energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions and oil rents on specific growth factors in the panel of Latin American countries (2017, background): “…in Argentina, Brazil, France, Pakistan, and USA, while ‘neutrality hypothesis’ holds in Finland, Hungary, India Japan, Switzerland, and the U.K. Apergis and Payne (2010) confirmed the feedback hypothesis between energy consumption and economic growth in the short-run, while in the longrun,…”
On the causal dynamics between emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and economic growth ☆ (2010, background): “…consumption and pollutant emissions on the other (Coondoo and Dinda, 2002; Dinda, 2004; Soytas et al., 2007; Chontanawat et al., 2008; Aslanidis and Iranzo, 2009; Apergis and Payne, 2009, 2010a); Sadorsky, 2009a; Sari and Soytas, 2009; Soytas and Sari, 2009; Ozturk, 2010; Payne, 2009, 2010a,b).”
The causal relationship between renewable energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from Europe (2017, background): “The empirical findings of this study are in line with the studies of Apergis and Payne (2010) for 20 OECD countries, Apergis and Payne (2011) for six Central American countries, Apergis and Payne (2012a, b) for 80 countries, AlMulali et al. (2013) for 108 countries, Pao and Fu (2013) and Cho et al.”
Nuclear energy consumption and economic growth in OECD countries: Cross-sectionally dependent heterogeneous panel causality analysis (2011, background): “Apergis and Payne (2010) examined the causality between nuclear energy consumption and economic growth for the panel of sixteen developed and newly developing countries by estimating panel vector error correction model.”
Nuclear energy consumption and economic growth in nine developed countries (2010, methodology): “In line with many researchers, in the absence of capital stock, gross fixed capital formation has been used as proxy for the stock of physical capital (see, Sari and Soytas, 2007; Lee and Chang, 2008; Narayan and Smyth, 2008; Apergis and Payne, 2010; Payne and Taylor, in press; WoldeRufael, 2009).”
Dynamics of Electricity Consumption, Oil Price and Economic Growth: Global Perspective (2017, methodology): “Kasperowicz (2016), Apergis and Payne (2010) and Satti et al. (2014), who reported that”