Pathways of organic carbon utilization in small lakes: Results from a whole‐lake 13C addition and coupled model

By J. Cole, Stephen R. Carpenter, J. Kitchell, Michael M. Pace. 2002

239 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In many small aquatic ecosystems, watershed loading of organic C exceeds autochthonous primary production. Although this allochthonous organic C has long been thought of as refractory, multiple lines of evidence indicate that substantial portions are respired in the receiving aquatic ecosystem. To what extent does this terrestrial C support secondary production of invertebrates and fish? Do current models adequately trace the pathways of allochthonous and autochthonous C through the food web? We evaluated the roles of allochthonous and autochthonous organic C by manipulating 13C content of dissolved inorganic C in a small, softwater, humic lake, thereby labeling autochthonous primary production for about 20 d. To ensure rapid and sufficient uptake of inorganic 13C, we enriched the lake with modest amounts of N and P. We constructed a carbon flow model based on the ambient and manipulated levels of 13C in C compartments in the lake, along with information on key rate processes. Despite the short nature of this experiment, several results emerged. (1) Fractionation of photosynthetically assimilated 13C‐CO2 by phytoplankton (ɛ) is lower (~6‰) than physiologic models would estimate (~20‰). (2) Bacteria respire, but do not assimilate, a large amount of terrestrially derived dissolved organic C (DOC) and pass little of this C to higher trophic levels. (3) The oxidation of terrestrial DOC is the major source of dissolved inorganic C in the lake. (4) Zooplankton production, a major food of young‐of‐year fishes, is predominantly derived from current autochthonous carbon sources under the conditions of this experiment.

Subfields: Environmental Chemistry, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b6a8838f7901478ca2e894513b94882bbd7c1fc1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Chemistry

  1. Jack J. Middelburg
  2. Pieter van Rijswijk
  3. Karline Soetaert
  4. Karel Van den Meersche
  5. H. Boschker
  6. J. Grey
  7. Roger I. Jones
  8. G. Yvon‐Durocher

In Oceanography

  1. Jack J. Middelburg
  2. Karline Soetaert
  3. L. Moodley
  4. H. Boschker
  5. Pieter van Rijswijk
  6. J. Grey
  7. Karel Van den Meersche
  8. A. Dittel

Citations in the corpus