Cladistic analysis of languages: Indo‐European classification based on lexicostatistical data

By Kateřina Rexová, Daniel Frynta, J. Zrzavý. 2003

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cultural Studies, Genetics, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b6a12ca8d8368a5d840dbba7905e1df641d57879

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cultural Studies

In Genetics

In Language and Linguistics

Citations in the corpus

On the relationship between interindividual cultural transmission and population-level cultural diversity: a case study of weaving in Iranian tribal populations (2009, background): “For example, many languages have been found to exhibit similarities that can be traced back to common ancestral populations that existed thousands of years ago (Gray & Atkinson, 2003; Gray & Jordan, 2000; Holden, 2002; Rexová et al., 2003).”
Phylogenetics and Material Cultural Evolution (2007, background): “…than linguistic affinity (the Slavic and Baltic languages are sister groups within the family of the Indo-European languages [Gray and Atkinson 2003; Rexová, Frynta, and Zrzavý 2003] whereas the Finnic languages belong to the Ural-Altaic family of languages [Uralic and Altaic languages 2001–4]).”
Evolutionary Linguistics (2008, methodology): “Indo-European trees have been constructed using both maximum parsimony (Rexová et al. 2003) and compatibility (Ringe et al. 2002).”
Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin (2003, result): “Recent parsimony and compatibility analyses have also supported these groupings, as well as a Romano-Germano-Celtic supergroup, the early divergence of Greek and Armenian lineage”
A review of long‐branch attraction (2005, background): “…1997; Sullivan and Swofford, 1997; Lin and Penny, 2001) and chloroplast genomes (Soltis and Soltis, 2004), and even morphological characters (Wiens and Hollingsworth, 2000; Lockhart and Cameron, 2001), as well as word data in linguistic applications of cladistic methods (Rexova et al., 2003).”
Innovation and cultural transmission in the American Paleolithic: Phylogenetic analysis of eastern Paleoindian projectile-point classes (2014, methodology): “…and Jordan, 2000; Gray et al., 2009; Holden and Mace, 2003; Jennings and Waters, 2014; Jordan and Shennan, 2003; Jordan et al., 2009; Matthews et al., 2011; O’Brien et al., 2008, 2012; Platnick and Cameron, 1977; Rexová et al., 2003; Tehrani, 2013; Tehrani and Collard, 2002; Tehrani et al., 2010).”