The IMPORTANT framework for analyzing the Impact of Mobility on Performance Of RouTing protocols for Adhoc NeTworks

551 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Multihop-Cluster-Based IEEE 802.11p and LTE Hybrid Architecture for VANET Safety Message Dissemination (2016, background): “domly deviating from the speed of a vehicle in their group as a function of a predetermined speed and angle deviation ratio [44], [45].”
MDDV: a mobility-centric data dissemination algorithm for vehicular networks (2004, unknown): “In the Manhattan mobility model [ 1 ], nodes are moving along streets, but wireless signals can still travel across streets as if there is no building between them.”
On the validity of geosocial mobility traces (2013, background): “Simulations of mobile ad hoc networks rely on a mobility model to generate movement patterns for arbitrary sized net works [5].”
Performance analysis of mobility-assisted routing (2006, background): “A number of mobility models have been proposed that better capture specific scenarios, like freeway movement [ 3 ], human mobility in campus environments [22,37], group mobility models [11], etc.”
Single-copy routing in intermittently connected mobile networks (2004, methodology): “Finally, we plan to evaluate the performance of some of the routing schemes proposed under more realistic mobility models, that exhibit correlation in both space and time [20], [ 19 ].”