Establishing Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research in Social Work
By Cynthia A. Lietz, Carol L. Langer, R. Furman. 2006
320 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b67168f1cdf8b5845035558f7d2c6fa959a4f746
Citations in the corpus
- Now I see it, now I don’t: researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research (2015, unknown): “Thus, it enhances the quality of the research by allowing researchers to ponder the ways in which who they are may both assist and hinder the process of co-constructing meanings (Lietz et al., 2006), frees them to handle and present the data better, and consider its complex meanings and contribution”
- Rigor in Qualitative Social Work Research: A Review of Strategies Used in Published Articles (2011, unknown): “But, as Lietz, Langer, and Furman (2006) suggested, judicious application of the key strategies helps to ensure that participant voices are heard and increases the likelihood that the work will meet other standards of quality.”
- Evaluating Qualitative Research for Social Work Practitioners (2010, unknown): “…identify member checking to be one of the most valuable strategies for increasing trustworthiness in qualitative research (Lincoln & Guba, 1985; Lietz et al., 2006), others acknowledge that member checking can raise practical concerns such as not being able to locate research participants or…”