Structured elicitation of expert judgments for threatened species assessment: a case study on a continental scale using email

180 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Levers and leverage points for pathways to sustainability (2020, background): “The intent was to minimize common expert biases such as dominance, overconfidence, framing effects and linguistic uncertainty (McBride et al., 2012).”
Mental models for conservation research and practice (2019, background): “…1998), how and why conservation practices are adopted (Prager & Curfs, 2016), how conservation is influenced by uncertain and complex social and political processes (Meliadou et al., 2012), and how people decide who should be involved in decision-making processes and why (Moon et al., 2017).”
The Delphi technique in ecology and biological conservation: applications and guidelines (2015, background): “…has evolved considerably and is considered particularly suitable for addressing multifaceted issues, especially when information is limited or conflicting (O’Faircheallaigh 2010; Martin et al. 2012; McBride et al. 2012) or for combining different types of evidence (Sutherland et al. 2013).”
A practical guide to structured expert elicitation using the IDEA protocol (2018, background): “Workshops usually result in better buy- in and acceptance of the outcomes than do exercises that are exclusively remote (Krueger et al., 2012; McBride et al., 2012).”
The magnitude of global marine species diversity. (2012, background): “data and opinions between experts at a workshop or video conference [17].”