Carbon footprinting—opportunities and threats
By Matthias Finkbeiner. 2009
352 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Environmental Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b668156ebe9b594a8635fa5fbe762eee942b28a2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Environmental Engineering
- T. Wiedmann
- G. P. Peters
- J. Barrett
- Manfred Lenzen
- Felix Creutzig
- Robbie M. Andrew
- M. Delucchi
- R. Plevin
Citations in the corpus
- INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS AND CARBON FOOTPRINTING: AN OVERVIEW OF APPLICATIONS (2009, neutral): “While the term certainly is, the methodological frameworks to calculate CFs have been developed over a long period of time (Finkbeiner, 2009).”
- EDITORIAL: CARBON FOOTPRINT AND INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS – AN INTRODUCTION (2009, methodology): “2 More initiatives have been launched by UNEP/SETAC, individual countries and industries (see, for example, Finkbeiner, 2009).”
- Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (2010, background): “More recently, evaluation approaches for single environmental issues like Carbon Footprinting [6] and Water Footprinting [7] have received considerable attention.”
- Using Attributional Life Cycle Assessment to Estimate Climate‐Change Mitigation Benefits Misleads Policy Makers (2014, methodology): “…life cycle environmental effects, there is no universally accepted, precisely defined, single method for conducting an LCA (International Organization for Standardization [ISO] 2006b; Finkbeiner 2009) and thus the precise meaning of “life cycle environmental impact” can differ from study to study.”
- A Review of the Ecological Footprint Indicator—Perceptions and Methods (2010, background): “Three significant standardization processes (for an overview see [14]) as well as a number of research reports and journal papers (e.”
- Water Footprinting: How to Address Water Use in Life Cycle Assessment? (2010, background): “The authors argue that this would make water footprinting more consistent with the current practice of carbon footprinting, which also comprises the accounting of greenhouse gas emissions along with a characterization step leading to CO2 equivalents.[6] However, the developers of the water footprint”
- Carbon footprint in green public procurement: Policy evaluation from a case study in the food sector (2016, neutral): “A key difference is that the public is typically remote, largely non-technical, and in need of first-hand interpretation (Finkbeiner, 2009).”
- Carbon footprints and embodied carbon at multiple scales (2010, methodology): “LCA traditionally focuses on a variety of environmental impacts [3,11] and this allows a more comprehensive environmental analysis, particularly in the context of co-benefits [19 ].”
- Carbon footprint: current methods of estimation (2011, background): “The concept of carbon footprinting has been in use since several decades but known differently as life cycle impact category indicator global warming potential (Finkbeiner 2009).”
- Carbon footprint of China's crop production—An estimation using agro-statistics data over 1993–2007 (2011, methodology): “Methodologically, CF is assessed with a hole analysis of total emissions from all inputs in a life cycle of roduction or consumption (Finkbeiner, 2009).”