Assessing large-scale surveyor variability in the historic forest data of the original U.S. Public Land Survey

By K. Manies, David J. Mladenoff, Erik V. Nordheim. 2001

88 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b6661a41b74f5932c50fbcb4dcdd2509cbffa532

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. J. Bouldin

In Insect Science

1. J. Bouldin
2. David J. Mladenoff

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. J. Bouldin
2. David J. Mladenoff

Citations in the corpus

• Self-organization and complexity in historical landscape patterns (2003, background): “In spite of various biases and constraints (Manies and Mladenoff 2000, Manies et al. 2001, Mladenoff et al. 2002), the surveys are widely recognized to provide a reliable basis for large-scale quantitative and qualitative information on landscapes prior to EuroAmerican settlement.”
• Some problems and solutions in density estimation from bearing tree data: a review and synthesis (2008, methodology): “Strong evidence of taxon-based preference has not been demonstrated in any study examining it (e.g. Kenoyer, 1929; Bourdo, 1956; Van Deelen et al., 1996; Almendinger, 1997; Manies et al., 2001; Dyer, 2001; Bouldin, in review), although methodological issues exist in several studies.”