Measurement scales and scale independence in the Analytic Hierarchy Process

By Pekka Leskinen. 2000

71 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b65c3cd346978f9cf310db88d51cc4bedd92513d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Jorge Carneiro
2. Alexandre Veronese Bentes
3. Thomas L. Saaty
4. J. F. Silva
5. Bakhtiar Feizizadeh
6. Herbert Kimura
7. Thomas Blaschke
8. Alessio Ishizaka

In Statistics and Probability

1. Thomas L. Saaty
2. Bakhtiar Feizizadeh
3. Thomas Blaschke

Citations in the corpus

• Multidimensional assessment of organizational performance: Integrating BSC and AHP☆ (2010, background): “Some of the assumptions that AHP relies upon are the object of intense debate, pro and con, as exemplified by conflicting studies (e.g., Bernhard & Canada, 1990; Dyer, 1990; Forman & Gass, 2001; Harker & Vargas, 1987; Lane & Verdini, 1989; Leskinen, 2000; Saaty, 1986, 1999; Schoner & Wedley, 1989).”
• Making and validating complex decisions with the AHP/ANP (2005, background): “B ( 17 ) Stamina (ST): Physical and psychological ability of a player to endure fatigue and pressure.”
• GIS-multicriteria decision analysis for landslide susceptibility mapping: comparing three methods for the Urmia lake basin, Iran (2012, methodology): “In this particular landslide analysis for Urmia lake basin, the criteria were represented by separate GIS dataset layers with memberships of different potential classes and were subsequently standardized using the maximum eigenvectors approach on a 0–1 scale.”