IF THE EVIDENCE IS SO GOOD – WHY DOESN'T ANYONE USE THEM? A NATIONAL SURVEY OF THE USE OF COMPUTERIZED COGNITIVE BEHAVIOUR THERAPY

By Graeme Whitfield, Christopher Williams. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 2004

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b65890ced3b0c0aae90304d83e3596555b34fc10

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. B. Meyer

In Social Psychology

1. Wolfgang Lutz
2. Steffen Moritz
3. Thomas Berger
4. C. Späth
5. Christiane Eichenberg
6. J. Klein
7. B. Meyer
8. M. Hautzinger

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Wolfgang Lutz

Citations in the corpus

• Attitudes Towards Internet Interventions Among Psychotherapists and Individuals with Mild to Moderate Depression Symptoms (2017, background): “In a British survey, for example, 329 psychotherapists rated cCBT-programs as less effective than traditional psychotherapy but as more effective than bibliotherapy (Whitfield and Williams 2004).”