Bias in freshwater biodiversity sampling: the case of Iberian water beetles

99 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Species distribution models that do not incorporate global data misrepresent potential distributions: a case study using Iberian diving beetles (2011, background): “Even though there is a general lack of exhaustive data regarding invertebrate species (Sánchez-Fernández et al., 2008), the survey effort is not particularly lower in underrepresented areas.”
Refugia within refugia – patterns in endemism and genetic divergence are linked to Late Quaternary climate stability in the Iberian Peninsula (2014, methodology): “, 2004) and water beetle data from (Sánchez-Fernández et al., 2008).”
Taxonomist survey biases and the unveiling of biodiversity patterns (2009, background): “For example, when species richness predictions for a whole territory are carried out using only the data from well-surveyed localities, the forecasted values tend to be higher in the most surveyed localities (Lobo and Martı́n-Piera, 2002; Romo et al., 2006; Sánchez-Fernández et al., 2008).”
Applications and limitations of museum data for conservation and ecology, with particular attention to species distribution models (2010, background): “Several studies on different taxonomic groups and in different countries have noted unevenness in the spatial coverage of sampling (Austin and Meyers, 1996; Peterson et al., 1998; Dennis and Hardy, 1999; Dennis et al., 1999; Hijmans et al., 2000; Soberón et al., 2000; Reddy and Dávalos, 2003; Kadmon”