Assessment of SAGE version 6.1 ozone data quality

By Hsiang J. Wang, D. Cunnold, L. Thomason, J. Zawodny, G. Bodeker. 2002

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A stratospheric ozone profile data set for 1979–2005: Variability, trends, and comparisons with column ozone data (2007, methodology): “Data are omitted for 2 years following the eruption of Pinatubo in June 1991, when high levels of stratospheric aerosols influenced the SAGE retrievals [ Wang et al., 2002 ].”
Ozone profile and tropospheric ozone retrievals from the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment: Algorithm description and validation (2005, methodology): “Wang et al. [2002] assessed the quality of SAGE-II version 6.1 ozone data and found the mean agreement between SAGE-II and ozonesondes is within 10% down to 15 km. Version 6.2 data are similar to version 6.1 data with differences usually Wang et al. [2002] found that SAGE-II ozone is larger than ”
Solar cycle variation of stratospheric ozone: Multiple regression analysis of long‐term satellite data sets and comparisons with models (2006, methodology): “…et al., 2004]; (2) the Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment II (SAGE II) ozone profile record for the period from late 1984 through 2003 [e.g., Wang et al., 2002]; and (3) the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (UARS) Halogen Occultation Experiment (HALOE) ozone profile record for the period…”