OIL: An Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web
By Dieter A. Fensel, Frank van Harmelen, Ian Horrocks, Deborah L. McGuinness, Peter F. Patel-Schneider. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2001
925 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b630a89c183c326b64915dd88fc785fa719a9054
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Ian Horrocks
- U. Sattler
- Ljiljana Stojanović
- Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- Thomas Lukasiewicz
- Franz Baader
- Frank van Harmelen
- Rudi Studer
In Molecular Biology
- Franz Baader
- Frank van Harmelen
- Ljiljana Stojanović
- Steffen Staab
- U. Sattler
- Andrew Burton-Jones
- Ian Horrocks
- Thomas Lukasiewicz
Citations in the corpus
- A semiotic metrics suite for assessing the quality of ontologies (2005, methodology): “Researchers are developing new languages and authoring tools to specify Web page semantics [12], determining how applications and intelligent agents might utilize the Semantic Web [21], and investigating approaches for querying the Semantic Web”
- eLearning based on the semantic web (2001, background): “A recent proposal extending RDF and RDF Schema is OIL (Ontology Interchange Language) (Fensel et al. 2001).”
- A semantic web primer (2004, background): “Fensel et al. OIL: An Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16,2 (2001). • D.”
- Description Logics as Ontology Languages for the Semantic Web (2005, background): “The actual use of DLs providing these features as the underlying logical formalism of the web ontology languages OIL and DAML+OIL [36, 52] substantiates this claim [76].”
- From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: the making of a Web Ontology Language (2003, methodology): “As there were already several ontology languages designed for use in the Web, OWL had to maintain as much compatibility as possible with these existing languages, including SHOE [18], OIL [12], and DAML+OIL [9].”
- Combining answer set programming with description logics for the Semantic Web (2004, positive): “OWL has three increasingly expressive sublanguages, namely OWL Lite, OWL DL, and OWL Full, where OWL DL basically corresponds to DAML+OIL (Horrocks 2002a; 2002b), which merges DAML (Hendler & McGuiness 2000) and OIL (Fensel et al. 2001). OWL Lite and OWL DL are essentially very expressive descriptio”
- Deploying and managing Web services: issues, solutions, and directions (2008, background): “They aim to construct a shared and common understanding of relevant domains across people, organizations, and application systems [40].”