Assessing the Long-Term System Value of Intermittent Electric Generation Technologies

By A. Lamont. 2008

262 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Pollution

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b62ff95617d84cde2fb4a3795de66c45545335cf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Lion Hirth
2. L. Reichenberg
3. Tu Berlin
4. Tom Brown
5. Ottmar Edenhofer
6. Falko Ueckerdt
7. R. Wiser
8. G. Barbose

In Pollution

1. Jordan Macknick
2. Ottmar Edenhofer
3. G. Heath
4. Lion Hirth
5. Falko Ueckerdt
6. S. Borenstein

Citations in the corpus

• The Optimal Share of Variable Renewables: How the Variability of Wind and Solar Power affects their Welfare-optimal Deployment (2012, unknown): “All rights reserved. are provided by Lamont (2008), Borenstein (2008), Joskow (2011), Mills & Wiser (2012), Nicolosi (2012), Hirth (2013), and Schmalensee (2013).”
• Decreasing market value of variable renewables can be avoided by policy action (2020, background): “5Note that Lamont [10] does not follow this approach, but draws in wind and solar by reducing their capital costs, thereby simulating the effects of technological learning and guaranteeing that costs are covered from the market.”
• Intermittency and the Value of Renewable Energy (2011, unknown): “A second strand addresses how fossil fuel capacity should be adjusted in response to large-scale renewables but often does not focus on the timevarying generation profile of renewable energy (see Lamont 2008; Skea et al. 2008; Campbell 2011).5 Our model combines insights from both these strands.”
• On the economics of renewable energy sources (2013, background): “On the other hand, a second branch of literature analyses wind and solar variability by estimating their marginal economic value (Lamont, 2008; Borenstein, 2008; Fripp and Wiser, 2008; Nicolosi, 2012a; Mills and Wiser, 2012; Hirth, 2013).”
• A retrospective analysis of benefits and impacts of U.S. renewable portfolio standards (2016, background): “…the overall generation mix will shift away from technologies with high up-front costs and low variable costs (i.e., coal and nuclear plants) and toward technologies with low up-front costs and higher variable costs (i.e., natural gas plants) (Sáenz de Miera et al. 2008; Lamont 2008; Bushnell 2010).”
• Market value of solar power: Is photovoltaics cost-competitive? (2015, background): “The varying price of electricity needs to be taken into account in any welfare, cost-benefit, or competitiveness analysis of variable renewables [30]-[32].”
• The Market Value of Variable Renewables The Effect of Solar and Wind Power Variability on their Relative Price (2013, unknown): “…& Weber (2006), Rosen et al. (2007), Neuhoff et al. (2008), Short et al. (2011), Haller et al. (2011), Mills & Wiser (2012), Nicolosi (2012) Martin & Diesendorf (1983), DeCarolis & Keith (2006), Lamont (2008), Bushnell (2010), Green & Vasilakos (2011) Quasi-fixed costs are fixed O&M costs.”
• The benefits of flexibility: The value of wind energy with hydropower (2016, methodology): “Theoretical (analytical) models, including Grubb [16], Lamont [13], and Hirth and Radebach [22].”
• System LCOE: What are the Costs of Variable Renewables? (2013, unknown): “However, there is criticism particularly towards evaluating variable renewables like wind and solar PV (photovoltaics) power based on LCOE because it ignores variability and integration costs.”