Avoiding the rating bounce: why rating agencies are slow to react to new information

By G. Löffler. 2005

178 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Finance

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b62b93df638d7acfb89757b3367beec3604ae503

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. C. Bannier
2. Fernando Gonzalez Gonzalez
3. David Dranove
4. G. Jin
5. Andre Guettler
6. Patrick Behr
7. Susan Feng Lu

In Finance

1. C. Bannier
2. Fernando Gonzalez Gonzalez
3. David Dranove
4. G. Jin
5. Andre Guettler
6. Patrick Behr

Citations in the corpus

• Rating opaque borrowers: why are unsolicited ratings lower? (2010, background): “Strategic rating behavior by the agencies, as the second argument, is particularly concerned with rating “errors” (Löffler, 2005).”
• Quality Disclosure and Certification: Theory and Practice (2010, background): “…(1989); Friedman (1990); Hong and Kubik (2003); Hubbard (1998); Hubbard (2002); ); Jin, Kato and List (2008); Kliger and Sarig (2000); Lim (2001); Loffler (2005); Macher, Mayo and Nickerson (2008); Michaely and Womack (1999); Pike (2004); Scanlon, Chernew, Sheffler, and Fendrick (1998); Tan and…”
• Market Dynamics Associated with Credit Ratings: A Literature Review (2004, background): “19 See, for example, Johnson (2003) and Löffler (2003).”