Process models representing knowledge for action: a revised quality framework
By John Krogstie, Guttorm Sindre, H. Jørgensen. European Journal of Information Systems, 2006
415 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Management Information Systems
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b612c981c9ceb703f682cb9fcc77825758ce7240
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Wil M.P. van der Aalst
- Boudewijn van Dongen
- Hajo Alexander Reijers
- Remco M. Dijkman
- Jan Mendling
- Minseok Song
- Manfred Reichert
- Bernd Weber
In Management Information Systems
- Wil M.P. van der Aalst
- Hajo Alexander Reijers
- Boudewijn van Dongen
- Jan Mendling
- Remco M. Dijkman
- Jorge S. Cardoso
- Manfred Reichert
- Bernd Weber
Citations in the corpus
- Measuring Similarity between Business Process Models (2008, background): “[15]) and process modeling languages (e.”
- What Makes Process Models Understandable? (2007, background): “One prominent top-down quality framework is the SEQUAL framework [9, 10].”
- Seven process modeling guidelines (7PMG) (2010, background): “This is the author-manuscript version of this work - accessed from http://eprints.qut.edu.au Mendling, Jan and Reijers, Hajo and van der Aalst, Wil M. (2008) Seven Process Modeling Guidelines (7PMG).”