Impacts of ecosystem fragmentation on plant populations: generalising the idiosyncratic

By Richard J. Hobbs, C. Yates. 2003

342 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b5e984c88de0ffebe60801273b4400e18a7f6d25

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. David B. Lindenmayer
2. J. Fischer
3. Pedro Jordano
4. M. Hagen
5. I. Leal
6. M. Tabarelli
7. C. Yates
8. Jane Elith

Citations in the corpus

• Australia's Biodiversity and Climate Change (2010, background): “Extensive habitat fragmentation and limited dispersal ability will create substantial barriers to migration; and the presence of invasive weeds, introduced diseases such as Phytophthora cinnamomi (see figure) and introduced predators may further limit natural adaptation responses (Hobbs and Yates 20”
• Assessing the integrated effects of landscape fragmentation on plants and plant communities: the challenge of multiprocess–multiresponse dynamics (2014, background): “After habitat loss, fragmentation of the remnant vegetation has been considered one of the major threats to terrestrial ecosystems (e.g. Ehrlich & Ehrlich 1981; Hobbs & Yates 2003).”
• Using historical ecology to understand patterns of biodiversity in fragmented agricultural landscapes (2005, background): “…nature of many studies has led to ongoing questions about the utility of the fragmentation paradigm (Simberloff & Abele, 1982; Gilpin & Soulé, 1986; Usher, 1987; Robinson et al., 1992; Hanski & Simberloff, 1997; Davies et al., 2001; Watson, 2002; Hobbs & Yates, 2003; Lindborg & Eriksson, 2004).”
• Effects of fragmentation on pollinator assemblage, pollen limitation and seed production of Mediterranean myrtle (Myrtus communis) (2009, background): “Plants, as sessile organisms, are prone to suffer these threats because of the spatial arrangement of habitat patches, which affects the ecological processes occurring within them, such as genetic bottlenecks, alteration of biotic interactions and biological invasions (Hobbs and Yates, 2003).”
• Plant Herbivore Interactions at the Forest Edge (2008, background): “Recent reviews (e.g. Yahner 1988; Saunders et al. 1991; Murcia 1995; Foggo et al. 2001; Laurance et al. 2002; Hobbs and Yates 2003; Harper et al. 2005) revealed an extensive suite of edge effects on forest biota with clear detrimental consequences for ecosystem functioning, particularly the long-ter”
• Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis (2007, background): “Despite this bias, we acknowledge that landscape modification also may change plant assemblages (Hobbs & Yates, 2003; Mayfield & Daily, 2005).”
• Projecting climate change impacts on species distributions in megadiverse South African Cape and Southwest Australian Floristic Regions: Opportunities and challenges (2009, background): “In the CFR and SWAFR habitat fragmentation can also affect the fecundity of species and opportunities for recruitment thereby further reducing species migration capacity (Donaldson et al. 2002; Hobbs & Yates 2003; Higgins et al. 2003c; Yates & Ladd 2005; Yates et al. 2007).”
• Genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation in plant populations: susceptible signals in plant traits and methodological approaches (2008, background): “Fax: +45-0351-4332104; E-mail: raguilar@imbiv.unc.edu.ar © 2008 The Authors Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd especially evaluating plant reproductive dynamics in fragmented habitats (Hobbs & Yates 2003; Ghazoul 2005; Honnay et al. 2005; Aguilar et al. 2006).”
• Biodiversity, species interactions and ecological networks in a fragmented world (2012, background): “Pollination rates at edges may decrease (Aizen and Feinsinger, 1994a,b; Burgess et al., 2006; Harris and Johnson, 2004; Hobbs and Yates, 2003), increase (Burgess et al., 2006), or may not change at all (Burgess et al., 2006), with implications for plant reproductive success (Burgess et al., 2006;…”