Multinational Corporations and European Regional Systems of Innovation

By John A. Cantwell, S. Iammarino. 2003

255 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b5e22ffd49ea890dd87d4f3140d5e7adb30f477f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

An evolutionary integrated view of Regional Systems of Innovation: Concepts, measures and historical perspectives (2005, background): “It is intuitive that the more diverse is the cultural base of a national system, the more meaningful the meso analysis appears to be and the less the assumptions of a Listian view of innovation systems hold.”
Heterogeneous MNC subsidiaries and technological spillovers: Explaining positive and negative effects in India (2010, background): “…unit of analysis (see for instance, Ghoshal and Bartlett, 1990; Birkinshaw and Hood, 1998; Cantwell and Janne, 1999; Kuemmerle, 1999; Papanastassiou and Pearce, 1999; Pearce, 1999; Zander, 1999; Kumar, 2001; Le Bas and Sierra, 2002; von Zedwitz and Gassman, 2002; Cantwell and Iammarino, 2003).”
Spatial Spillovers and Innovation Activity in European Regions (2005, result): “This result is not surprising because it corroborates previous findings (Cantwell and Iammarino, 2003) that national innovation systems, to a certain extent, still dominate the common European one.”
From R&D to Innovation and Economic Growth in the EU (2004, background): “The question is especially sensitive for peripheral regions, which traditionally have lacked a clear-cut scientific and technological strategy and the firms capable of generating technological linkages with other locations (Cantwell and Iammarino, 2003).”
Global investments and regional development trajectories: the missing links (2016, unknown): “benefits stemming from tapping into new sources of innovation and technical knowledge elsewhere (Cantwell and Iammarino, 2003; Castellani and Pieri, 2013).”
Measuring technological capabilities at the country level: A survey and a menu for choice (2005, background): “Regions and multinational corporation qually importantloci for technological competenc Cantwell and Iammarino, 2003) and can be taken eaningful statistical units.”
Regional inequality in Europe: evidence, theory and policy implications (2019, unknown): “Agglomeration and hierarchies of regional systems (Cantwell and Iammarino, 2003), and greater divergence among groups of regions (Storper, 1997) are the result of these processes.”
Mountains in a flat world: Why proximity still matters for the location of economic activity (2008, unknown): “innovation (Audretsch and Feldman 2004; Cantwell and Iammarino 2003).”
The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: evidence from a Chilean wine cluster (2005, background): “…networking, since the mere reliance on localised knowledge can result in the ‘entropic death’ of the cluster that remains lockedin to an increasingly obsolete technological trajectory (Camagni, 1991; Grabher, 1993; Becattini and Rullani, 1993; Guerrieri et al., 2001; Cantwell and Iammarino, 2003).”
Geographical proximity and innovation: Evidences from the Campos Basin oil & gas industrial agglomeration—Brazil (2009, background): “Cantwell and Iammarino (2003) state that a large and growing share of innovation is concentrated in and around MNCs by virtue of their size, geographical locations and their ability of balancing the use of knowledge both intra-firm and extra-firm resources.”
Innovation drivers, value chains and the geography of multinational corporations in Europe (2014, background): “‘Soft’ factors related to the innovation capacities of the host regions, as drivers of MNCs location decisions, have instead become the focus of indepth case studies, failing to ensure the same degree of generality achieved by more formal quantitative research (Cantwell and Iammarino, 2003).”
Cluster Absorptive Capacity (2005, background): “They have shown that the inflow of knowledge into a cluster can be both driven by actors from outside which are attracted into the cluster by the availability of natural or knowledge resources as well as by local actors who try to tap into outside knowledge (Cantwell and Iammarino, 2003).”