The Changing Incidence of Geography

By James E. Anderson, Yoto V. Yotov. 2010

405 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b5e1ec81e56f8f1d499c46af0d16b5f94c849ac3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Trade Costs in the Developing World: 1996–2010 (2015, background): “7 Anderson and Yotov (2010) also adopt what could be termed a “top down” approach to calculating internal relative to multilateral trade costs for Canadian provinces.”
Intra-national trade costs: Assaying regional frictions (2019, methodology): “The first two terms under the exponentiation operator of (5) are designed to capture the evolution of internal trade costs in Canada over time.”
Structural Gravity and Fixed Effects (2015, neutral): “This approach ignores the structure proposed by equations (2) and (3).”
Pollution Haven and Corruption Paradise (2017, positive): “To con rm this, we have reported summary statistics in Table (2):”
Trade and the global recession (2016, neutral): “[6] Anderson, James E.”
An Advanced Guide to Trade Policy Analysis: The Structural Gravity Model (2016, background): “Anderson and Yotov (2010) present and discuss sectoral gravity estimates with goods trade.”
Trade, Domestic Frictions, and Scale Effects (2016, methodology): “Proposition 1 combined with A1 and the expression for Tn in (6) yields Tn = φnLn, which plugged into (8) reveals that the average real wage in country n is given by Un = γ × (φnLn) 1/θ × λ−1/θ nn .”
Estimating the effects of non‐discriminatory trade policies within structural gravity models (2017, positive): “A byproduct of our approach is that it can be used to obtain estimates of the elasticity of substitution, which is the single most important parameter in the international trade literature; see Arkolakis et al. (2012). This has implications for trade policy analysis because it enables researchers to”
Nonparametric Counterfactual Predictions in Neoclassical Models of International Trade (2017, methodology): “Similarly, under the assumption of nested CES utility, one could obtain the same factor demand system by assuming an Armington model, as in Anderson and Yotov (2010).”
Estimating General Equilibrium Trade Policy Effects: GE PPML (2015, positive): “The data set that we employ here is a subsample of the data from Anderson and Yotov (2015), which covers total manufacturing trade, including intra-national trade for 40 countries and a rest of the world aggregate over the period 1990-2002. Given the methodological purposes of this study, we focus o”
Gold Standard Gravity (2012, neutral): “The system only solves for the multilateral resistances up to a normalization, which may be chosen for convenience (Anderson and Yotov, 2010a), as its value is irrelevant to the methods below.”
Revealed comparative advantage: What is it good for? (2017, background): “…heterogeneity, á la Eaton and Kortum (2002), along with disaggregated trade data to uncover countries’ underlying patterns of comparative advantage, it is related to papers such as Anderson and Yotov (2010), Costinot et al. (2012), Caliendo and Parro (2014), and Levchenko and Zhang (2014).”
Domestic Trade Frictions and Agriculture (2015, methodology): “Using a different model, Anderson and Yotov (2010) show also how to use the model structure to recover model parameters.”
Trade Theory with Numbers: Quantifying the Consequences of Globalization (2013, neutral): “…s = 1, ..., S, by assuming a two-tier utility function in which the upper-level is Cobb-Douglas and the lower-level is CES; see e.g. Anderson and Yotov (2010), Donaldson (2008), Caliendo and Parro (2010), Costinot, Donaldson, and Komunjer (2010), Hsieh and Ossa (2011), Levchenko and Zhang…”