Pollen fates and the limits on male reproductive success in an orchid population

By Steven B. Johnson, P. R. Neal, Lawrence D. Harder. 2005

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b5d954e4ac9cb114026efdd26a797b17496ba9c7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Lawrence D. Harder
2. Steven B. Johnson
3. Jon Ågren
4. N. Sletvold

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Steven B. Johnson
2. Jon Ågren
3. N. Sletvold
4. Lawrence D. Harder

In Plant Science

1. Lawrence D. Harder
2. Steven B. Johnson
3. Jon Ågren

Citations in the corpus

• Pollinator-Mediated Selection on Floral Display and Spur Length in the Orchid Gymnadenia conopsea (2010, background): “However, pollen removal may provide biased estimates of pollen export to other plants (Johnson et al. 2005) and siring success (Snow and Lewis 1993), and direct estimates of male fitness through paternity analyses would be needed to compare reliably selection patterns through the two sex functions.”
• Function and Evolution of Aggregated Pollen in Angiosperms (2008, background): “Geitonogamy is probably a widespread cause of diminishing returns during pollen dispersal, as it occurs commonly and can be the main mode of self-pollination, regardless of the type of pollinator (reviewed by Harder et al. [2004]; see also Harder and Johnson 2005; Johnson et al. 2005).”