Functional response in habitat selection and the tradeoffs between foraging niche components in a large herbivore

By B. Hansen, I. Herfindal, R. Aanes, B. Sæther, Snorre Henriksen. 2009

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Multi-level functional responses for wildlife conservation: the case of threatened caribou in managed boreal forests (2012, background): “First, functional responses are generally detected whenever tested on various species (e.g. Mysterud & Ims 1998; Hebblewhite & Merrill 2008; Godvik et al. 2009; Hansen et al. 2009; Herfindal et al. 2009; Gillies & St Clair 2010), including threatened ones (e.g. Mauritzen et al. 2003; current study).”
Using presence‐only modelling to predict Asian elephant habitat use in a tropical forest landscape: implications for conservation (2010, methodology): “Vegetation productivity was measured as the relative greenness of a pixel which was calculated as the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI, cf. Hansen et al., 2009a).”
Scale dependency and functional response in moose habitat selection (2009, background): “There are evidences that the availability of resources influence the degree of selection for that resource (Mysterud and Ims 1998, Mysterud and Østbye 1999, Osko et al. 2004, Godvik et al. 2009, Hansen et al. 2009a, b).”