OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: structural specification and functional-style syntax
By Boris Motik, Peter F. Patel-Schneider, Bijan Parsia, C. Bock, Achille Fokoue, P. Haase, Rinke Hoekstra, Ian Horrocks, A. Ruttenberg, Ulrike Sattler and 1 more. 2008
997 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b5d378283560cc2a2d80ad7a91f8b4f2e17a33ad
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Birte Glimm
- Boris Motik
- Ian Horrocks
- Claudio Bettini
- Sean Bechhofer
- Giorgos Stoilos
- Karen Henricksen
- Oliver Brdiczka
Citations in the corpus
- The OWL API: A Java API for OWL ontologies (2011, methodology): “Version 3, the latest release, sees an alignment of method and class names with those used in the OWL 2 Structural Specification [32].”
- A survey of context modelling and reasoning techniques (2010, background): “Even if proposed extensions of OWL promise to overcome part of these limitations (in particular, by including a restricted form of property composition [37]), at the time of writing the definition of some context domains with OWL-DL can be problematic.”
- Semantics : Science , Services and Agents on the World Wide Web (2014, background): “The OWL Structural Specification [48] permits use of anonymous individuals in assertions, which allow for representing objects that are local to a given ontology and whose identity is not given.”
- Relationships and data sanitization: a study in scarlet (2010, methodology): “There are many ontology languages including OWL-Lite, OWL DL, OWL Full [30], OWL 2 [39, 63], RDF Schema [22], SADL [61], DAML+OIL [43], and CASL [9, 62].”
- HermiT: An OWL 2 Reasoner (2014, background): “1OWL ontologies can include references to other ontologies that are to be ‘imported’ (syntactically added) into the current ontology [28].”
- A Scenario-Adaptive Driving Behavior Prediction Approach to Urban Autonomous Driving (2017, methodology): “In this study, we chose Description Logic (DL) as a formalism to represent the ontology knowledge base and store it with Web Ontology Language 2 (OWL 2) [28].”