The Characteristics that Provide Independent Information about Average U.S. Monthly Stock Returns
By Jeremiah Green, John R. M. Hand, Frank Zhang. 2017
480 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Finance, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b5ac1023a8fdee47fd43f99ccecb18779066ecc1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Ulrich Gunter
- Snehal Banerjee
- Joseph E. Engelberg
- Bradyn Breon-Drish
- Georgios Sermpinis
- R. Gibson Brandon
- Philipp Krueger
- Pierre Pinson
In Finance
- David F. Hendry
- David E. Rapach
- Michael P. Clements
- D. Xiu
- Shihao Gu
- Jennifer L. Castle
- Feng Li
- Xiaoqian Wang
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Fotios Petropoulos
- Rob J Hyndman
- Konstantinos Nikolopoulos
- Nikolaos Kourentzes
- Vassilios Assimakopoulos
- Spyros Makridakis
- Evangelos Spiliotis
- Christoph Bergmeir
Citations in the corpus
- Discussion of “disclosure processing costs, investors' information choice, and equity market outcomes: A review” (2020, methodology): “This mechanism builds on the insights of Grossman and Stiglitz (1980).8 We assume that it is commonly known that q ¼ 1 (i.e., it is commonly known that the public signal is payoff relevant).”
- Taming the Factor Zoo: A Test of New Factors (2019, unknown): “Green, Hand, and Zhang (2017) test 94 firm characteristics using Fama-Macbeth regressions and find that 8 to 12 characteristics are significant independent determinants of average returns.”
- Empirical Asset Pricing via Machine Learning (2018, methodology): “30The 94 predictive characteristics are based on Green et al. (2017), and we adapt the SAS code available from Jeremiah Green’s website and extend the sample period back to 1957.”
- Anomalies across the globe: Once public, no longer existent? (2020, unknown): “In Panel D, we only keep anomalies which are also taken into account in at least one of the following meta studies on return predictability: Green et al. (2013), Green et al. (2017), Harvey et al. (2016), Hou et al. (2018), and McLean and Pontiff (2016).”
- Shrinking the Cross Section∗ (2017, unknown): “Green et al. (2017) and Harvey et al. (2015) adjust significance thresholds to account for such data mining.”
- ESG Rating Disagreement and Stock Returns (2019, result): “Other research also has shown that return predictability fell sharply after 2003 (Green, Hand, and Zhang 2017).”
- Forecasting: theory and practice (2020, background): “…of cross-sectional stock returns based on a large number of firm characteristics from the cross-sectional literature (e.g., Harvey et al., 2016; McLean and Pontiff, 2016; Hou et al., 2020), extending the conventional OLS approach of Haugen and Baker (1996), Lewellen (2015), and Green et al. (2017).”
- A Transaction-Cost Perspective on the Multitude of Firm Characteristics (2020, unknown): “Indeed, Green, Hand, and Zhang (2017) considers 94 characteristics and finds using Fama-MacBeth regressions that 12 are jointly signifi- 5In addition to the 50 firm-specific characteristics, we consider also beta (i.e., the exposure of each stock to the market-return factor) because of its…”