Valuing Objects and Evaluating Policies in Imperfect Economies

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Welfare Economic Theory of Green National Accounts (2008, methodology): “For illustrations of those possibilities using crude data from contemporary national accounts, see Dasgupta (2001b), Dasgupta (2007) and Arrow et al. (2007), Arrow et al. (2008).”
Challenges and Opportunities for Resource Rich Economies (2006, unknown): “…wealth per capita is the correct measure of social welfare if the population growth rate is constant, per capita consumption is independent of population size and production has constant returns to scale and current saving is the present value of future changes in consumption (Dasgupta, 2001).”
Natural Resources: Curse or Blessing? (2011, background): “Wealth per capita is the correct measure of social welfare if the population growth rate is constant, per capita consumption is independent of population size, production has constant returns to scale, and current saving is the present value of future changes in consumption (Dasgupta 2001a).”
Evaluating Projects and Assessing Sustainable Development in Imperfect Economies (2003, background): “(58) 30 See also Hartwick and Hageman (1993) for a fine discussion that links El Serafy's formula to Hicks' formulation of the concept of national income (Hicks, 1942).”
Corruption, the resource curse and genuine saving (2007, unknown): “Dasgupta (2001, p.C9f.) argues that it is an overestimate since human capital is lost when people die.”