Stellar populations of early-type galaxies in different environments - II. Ages and metallicities

By P. Sánchez-Blázquez, J. Gorgas, N. Cardiel, J. González. 2006

166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This is the second paper of a series devoted to the study of the stellar content of early-type galaxies. The goal of the series is to set constraints on the evolutionary status of these objects Methods. We use a new set of models that include an improved stellar library (MILES) to derive simple stellar population (SSP)-equivalent parameters in a sample of 98 early-type galaxies. The sample contains galaxies in the field, poor groups, and galaxies in the Virgo and Coma clusters. Results. We find that low-density environment galaxies span a larger range in SSP age and metallicity than their counterparts in high density environments, with a tendency for lower sigma galaxies to be younger. Early-type galaxies in low-density environments appear on average similar to 1.5 Gyr younger and more metal rich than their counterparts in high density environments. The sample of low-density environment galaxies shows an age-metallicity relation in which younger galaxies are found to be more metal rich, but only when metallicity is measured with a Fe-sensitive index. Conversely, there is no age-metallicity relation when the metallicity is measured with a Mg sensitive index. The mass-metallicity relation is only appreciable for the low-density environment galaxies when the metallicity is measured with a Mg-sensitive index, and not when the metallicity is measured with other indicators. On the contrary, this relation exists for the high-density environment galaxies independent of the indicator used to measure the metallicity. Conclusions. This suggests a dependence of the mass-metallicity relation on the environment of the galaxies. Our data favour a scenario in which galaxies in low density environments have suffered a more extended star formation history than the galaxies in the Coma cluster, which appear to host more homogenous stellar populations.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b5875dfe0d9a0f784d55b85e7246b358ffb753e2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. J. Falc'on-Barroso
  2. A. Vazdekis
  3. E. Ricciardelli
  4. C. Conroy
  5. M. Cappellari
  6. M. Koleva
  7. P. Sánchez-Blázquez
  8. F. Barbera

In Instrumentation

  1. J. Falc'on-Barroso
  2. A. Vazdekis
  3. C. Conroy
  4. E. Ricciardelli
  5. M. Koleva
  6. M. Cappellari
  7. P. Sánchez-Blázquez
  8. A. Cenarro

Citations in the corpus