Time synchronization in ad hoc networks

By Kay Römer. ACM Interational Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing, 2001

581 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Simple, accurate time synchronization for wireless sensor networks (2003, background): “The correctness of the presented approach is not affected in any way if node 2 does not respond immediately.”
SECTOR: secure tracking of node encounters in multi-hop wireless networks (2003, background): “We note however that some proposals have been developed [23].”
Gradient clock synchronization in wireless sensor networks (2009, background): “Römer presents a system [19] where events are time-stamped with the local clock.”
A scalable synchronization protocol for large scale sensor networks and its applications (2005, methodology): “They are obviously incompatible with the structure of sensor networks that are ad hoc and distributed in nature.”
Clock synchronization for wireless sensor networks: a survey (2005, methodology): “RBS [19], the protocol by Mock et al. [49], asynchronous diﬀusion [42], and TDP [62] have higher computational and storage complexity compared to Romer (cid:1) s protocol [56], network-wide time synchronization [25], and the protocol by Sic-hitiu and Veerarittiphan [58].”
Timing-sync protocol for sensor networks (2003, methodology): “The algorithm proposed in [11] is only initiated when events take place in the network.”
Global clock synchronization in sensor networks (2006, methodology): “Papers on synchronization in sensor networks include [6], [5], [7], [16].”