Bacterial communities associated with the rhizosphere of transgenic Bt 176 maize (Zea mays) and its non transgenic counterpart

By L. Brusetti, P. Francia, C. Bertolini, A. Pagliuca, S. Borin, C. Sorlini, A. Abruzzese, G. Sacchi, C. Viti, L. Giovannetti and 3 more. Plant and Soil, 2005

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Molecular Biology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b5764d92ad7e60d1b66613961af3ead90e8333d7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

1. M. Gómez-Brandón
2. J. Domínguez
3. E. Bååth
4. J. Rousk

In Plant Science

1. M. Gómez-Brandón
2. Manuel Aira
3. J. Domínguez
4. C. Lazcano
5. E. Martínez-Romero
6. M. Rosenblueth
7. E. Bååth
8. J. Rousk

Citations in the corpus

• Plant genotype strongly modifies the structure and growth of maize rhizosphere microbial communities (2010, background): “In this way, Brusetti et al. (2004) found that rhizosphere microbial communities in transgenic Bt 176 maize plants differed from those in the nontransgenic counterpart.”
• Analysis of the Bacterial Diversity Associated with theRoots of Maize (Zeamays L.) through Culture-Dependent and Culture-Independent Methods (2011, result): “Estimated bacterial numbers here are within the ranges with the ones reported for maize endophytes in previous surveys [23, 24, 26].”
• Ecological compatibility of GM crops and biological control (2009, unknown): “The compositions of bacterial communities (Devare et al., 2004; Baumgarte and Tebbe, 2005) and the relative abundances of bacterial classes (Brusetti et al., 2004) did not differ among Bt and non-Bt treatments.”