The Euro and the Battle of Ideas

By C. Mulhearn. 2017

152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b56ecdfc5a23c80412c92a0dca7efd7b7e5fa0b9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Carlo Altavilla
2. Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh
3. M. Rostagno
4. M. Pagano
5. Markus K. Brunnermeier
6. Giacomo Carboni
7. Roberto Motto
8. Dimitri Vayanos

Citations in the corpus

• ESBies: Safety in the Tranches (2017, background): “Why did this happen? Among many factors, the euro area lacked institutional features necessary for the success of a monetary union, including emergency funding for sovereigns and common banking supervision and resolution (Brunnermeier et al., 2016).”
• A Tale of Two Decades: The Ecb's Monetary Policy at 20 (2019, background): “While Brunnermeier and Koby (2018) have defined a (negative) reversal rate above which the NIRP is expansionary, and below which the NIRP becomes contractionary, others have been more radical in disqualifying the NIRP as a valid instrument to ease policy.”