Microeconometrics Using Stata: Revised Edition

By A. Cameron, Pravin K. Trivedi. 2010

606 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b56b49af75bd4f831502ba47e088bc05c73a07c3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Making Yourself Attractive: Pre-Marital Investments and the Returns to Education in the Marriage Market (2012, methodology): “20Given the fact that the standard errors are clustered, the standard Cragg-Donald statistic is incorrect and Cameron and Trivedi (2010) (p.”
Commuter Mode Choice and Free Car Parking, Public Transportation Benefits, Showers/Lockers, and Bike Parking at Work: Evidence from the Washington, DC Region (2014, background): “Coefficients have been transformed into odds ratios, which give the proportionate change in the relative risk of choosing a given alternative, rather than the reference category (Cameron and Trivedi 2010).”
Bringing It All Back Home – Return Migration and Fertility Choices (2015, methodology): “The reliance on this two-stage residual inclusion, 2SRI, estimator has been also proposed by Cameron and Trivedi (2010) in the specific case where the equation of interest is Poisson, and it has been applied by Fang, Eggleston, Rizzo, and Zeckhauser (2010) for the analysis of the determinants of…”
Waste Prevention and Social Preferences: The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations (2014, background): “The ordered logit has the following specification (Cameron and Trivedi, 2010): iii xy '* Where *iy is a latent variable measuring the level food waste, ix is a set of explicative regressors (without an intercept), and iu is an error term logistically distributed.”
Response of residential electricity demand to price: The effect of measurement error (2011, background): “See Cameron and Trivedi (2005, 2010) for a discussion of this issue.”
Estimating Gender Disparities in Federal Criminal Cases (2015, background): “The Tobit is not robust to violations of its assumptions of normality and homoskedasticity (see, for example, Arabmazar and Schmidt 1982; Cameron and Trivedi 2010)—and in this sample, specification tests for the Tobit are decisively failed.”