The nexus approach to water–energy–food security: an option for adaptation to climate change
By G. Rasul, Bikash Sharma. 2016
582 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Developing countries face a difficult challenge in meeting the growing demands for food, water, and energy, which is further compounded by climate change. Effective adaptation to change requires the efficient use of land, water, energy, and other vital resources, and coordinated efforts to minimize trade-offs and maximize synergies. However, as in many developing countries, the policy process in South Asia generally follows a sectoral approach that does not take into account the interconnections and interdependence among the three sectors. Although the concept of a water–energy–food nexus is gaining currency, and adaptation to climate change has become an urgent need, little effort has been made so far to understand the linkages between the nexus perspective and adaptation to climate change. Using the Hindu Kush Himalayan region as an example, this article seeks to increase understanding of the interlinkages in the water, energy, and food nexus, explains why it is important to consider this nexus in the context of adaptation responses, and argues that focusing on trade-offs and synergies using a nexus approach could facilitate greater climate change adaptation and help ensure food, water, and energy security by enhancing resource use efficiency and encouraging greater policy coherence. It concludes that a nexus-based adaption approach – which integrates a nexus perspective into climate change adaptation plans and an adaptation perspective into development plans – is crucial for effective adaptation. The article provides a conceptual framework for considering the nexus approach in relation to climate change adaptation, discusses the potential synergies, trade-offs, and offers a broader framework for making adaptation responses more effective. Policy relevance This article draws attention to the importance of the interlinkages in the water, energy, and food nexus, and the implications for sustainable development and adaptation. The potential synergies and complementarities among the sectors should be used to guide formulation of effective adaptation options. The issues highlight the need for a shift in policy approaches from a sectoral focus, which can result in competing and counterproductive actions, to an integrated approach with policy coherence among the sectors that uses knowledge of the interlinkages to maximize gain, optimize trade-offs, and avoid negative impacts.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Pollution, Water Science and Technology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b563f05df80a25b146d6517b6f07be361ffa9dbb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
In Pollution
In Water Science and Technology
Citations in the corpus
- Sustaining Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in the Hindu Kush Himalaya (2019, background): “Although the agriculture ecosystem only covers 5% of the total area, it is key to the direct provision of food and food security and nutrient supply (Rasul and Sharma 2015).”
- Climate-smart agriculture: perspectives and framings (2018, background): “The co-benefits approach to CSA is a multiple ‘win-win’ strategy and one that would require programmes to rethink agricultural landscapes within the food–water–energy nexus (Bogdanski, 2012; Rasul & Sharma, 2016; Scherr, Shames, & Friedman, 2012).”
- Climate change and the water–energy–food nexus: insights from policy and practice in Tanzania (2018, background): “…approaches towards more horizontally integrated approaches which is seen as a positive step towards more effective implementation with risks of maladaptation reduced (Barnett & O’Neill, 2010; Chasek, 2010; Kalaba, Quinn, & Dougill, 2014; Nunan, Campbell, & Foster, 2012; Rasul & Sharma, 2016).”
- Understanding barriers to decision making in the UK energy-food-water nexus: The added value of interdisciplinary approaches (2016, background): “…understand and eliminate trade-offs and tensions across and between these sectors (Rasul, 2015; Rasul and Sharma, 2015), whilst simultaneously highlighting opportunities, synergies and common goals (e.g. the UK’s EPSRC Sandpit water-energy-food…”