Anticipated moments: temporal structure in attention

By Anna Christina Nobre, F. V. Ede. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2017

519 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Neural Basis of Timing: Distributed Mechanisms for Diverse Functions (2018, background): “Temporal attention decreases reaction time and increases performance—e.g., discrimination is better in trials in which the stimulus occurs at the expected time (Nobre et al., 2007; Jaramillo and Zador, 2011; Cravo et al., 2013; Nobre and van Ede, 2018).”
Cortical encoding of probabilistic temporal predictions during speech perception (2026, unknown): “The predictions derived from the PDF and HR models were signiﬁcantly encoded, in line with the established role of rhythm in sensory (20, 33) and, speciﬁcally, speech processing (12, 62).”
Spontaneous α Brain Dynamics Track the Episodic “When” (2023, background): “…by known nonstationarities in brain rhythms challenging the role of neural oscillations in cognition ( Steriade et al., 1990; Cole and Voytek, 2017; van Ede et al., 2018), recent description of time cells with long and diverse periods (Pastalkova et al., 2008; MacDonald et al., 2011; Kraus et al.,…”
Neural oscillations track the maintenance and proceduralization of novel instructions (2021, background): “This rules out the possibility that the observed diﬀerences reﬂect more general mechanisms of unspeciﬁc motor energization, temporal estimation or target expectancy ( Nobre & Van Ede, 2018 ; Van El-swijk, Kleine, Overeem, & Stegeman, 2007 ; Wiener, Parikh, Krakow, & Coslett, 2018 ).”