Feeding ecology of yellow-legged gulls Larus michahellis in the western Mediterranean: a comparative assessment using conventional and isotopic methods
By Raül Ramos, F. Ramírez, C. Sanpera, Lluís Jover, X. Ruíz. 2009
131 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b5441755581dc7aa90c7e16f785b1debda3e0903
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Manuel Guillermo Forero
- M. Genovart
- Daniel Oro
- Joan Navarro
- Keith A. Hobson
- M. Louzao
- A. Delgado
- A. Velando
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- M. Genovart
- Daniel Oro
- Jaime Ramos
- Keith A. Hobson
- Manuel Guillermo Forero
- José-Manuel Igual
- J. M. Arcos
- M. Louzao
Citations in the corpus
- Annual and seasonal consistency in the feeding ecology of an opportunistic species, the yellow-legged gull Larus michahellis (2014, methodology): “This increase has been mainly attributed to the ability of gulls to adapt to human-altered environments by opportunistically exploiting both terrestrial (e.g. refuse dumps) and marine (e.g. fishery discards) resources (Moreno et al. 2009, Ramos et al. 2009a).”
- Age and sexual differences in the exploitation of two anthropogenic food resources for an opportunistic seabird (2010, background): “2009) or the use of marine or terrestrial food (Ramos et al. 2009).”
- A three-isotope approach to disentangling the diet of a generalist consumer: the yellow-legged gull in northwest Spain (2010, methodology): “Although isotopic mixing models are very helpful in providing quantitative indices of food item contributions to a consumer’s diet (Caut et al. 2008; Ramos et al. 2009a), they require prior conventional diet analysis in order to correctly select potential preys.”
- Seasonal changes in the diet of a critically endangered seabird and the importance of trawling discards (2009, background): “Boxes represent the range of expected values in the consumer, considering 99% CI for prey and accounting for diet-blood isotopic fractionation factors of 1.7‰ for 15N and 0.9‰ for 13C (following Ramos et al. 2009).”