Recovering an unknown source in a fractional diffusion problem
By William Rundell, Zhidong Zhang. 2017
47 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract A standard inverse problem is to determine a source which is supported in an unknown domain D from external boundary measurements. Here we consider the case of a time-independent situation where the source is equal to unity in an unknown subdomain D of a larger given domain Ω and the boundary of D has the star-like shape, i.e. ∂ D = { q ( θ ) ( cos θ , sin θ ) ⊤ : θ ∈ [ 0 , 2 π ] } . Overposed measurements consist of time traces of the solution or its flux values on a set of discrete points on the boundary ∂Ω. The case of a parabolic equation was considered in [6] . In our situation we extend this to cover the subdiffusion case based on an anomalous diffusion model and leading to a fractional order differential operator. We will show a uniqueness result and examine a reconstruction algorithm. One of the main motives for this work is to examine the dependence of the reconstructions on the parameter α, the exponent of the fractional operator which controls the degree of anomalous behaviour of the process. Some previous inverse problems based on fractional diffusion models have shown considerable differences between classical Brownian diffusion and the anomalous case.
Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mathematical Physics, Modeling and Simulation
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- G. Em Karniadakis
- Lu Lu
- Guofei Pang
- Paris Perdikaris
- Dongbin Xiu
- Maizar Raissi
- Habib N. Najm
- Youssef M. Marzouk
In Mathematical Physics
In Modeling and Simulation
Citations in the corpus
- fPINNs: Fractional Physics-Informed Neural Networks (2018, background): “For inverse problems, little is known about 3D space-time-fractional ADEs with a fractional Laplacian, despite some existing works on 1D and 2D problems [27, 38, 13].”