NAS-FPN: Learning Scalable Feature Pyramid Architecture for Object Detection
By Golnaz Ghiasi, Tsung-Yi Lin, Ruoming Pang, Quoc V. Le. 2019
1,781 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Current state-of-the-art convolutional architectures for object detection are manually designed. Here we aim to learn a better architecture of feature pyramid network for object detection. We adopt Neural Architecture Search and discover a new feature pyramid architecture in a novel scalable search space covering all cross-scale connections. The discovered architecture, named NAS-FPN, consists of a combination of top-down and bottom-up connections to fuse features across scales. NAS-FPN, combined with various backbone models in the RetinaNet framework, achieves better accuracy and latency tradeoff compared to state-of-the-art object detection models. NAS-FPN improves mobile detection accuracy by 2 AP compared to state-of-the-art SSDLite with MobileNetV2 model in [32] and achieves 48.3 AP which surpasses Mask R-CNN [10] detection accuracy with less computation time.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Quoc V. Le
- Jianfeng Gao
- Alan L. Yuille
- Mohit Bansal
- Dacheng Tao
- Jiashi Feng
- Trevor Darrell
- Chunhua Shen
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Luc Van Gool
- Dacheng Tao
- Xiaogang Wang
- Alan L. Yuille
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Trevor Darrell
- Chunhua Shen
- Yi Yang
Citations in the corpus
- GShard: Scaling Giant Models with Conditional Computation and Automatic Sharding (2020, background): “For computer vision, increasing the model capacity has led to better image classification and detection accuracy for various computer vision architectures [7, 8, 9].”
- Attention Augmented Convolutional Networks (2019, background): “As such, it would be interesting to see if using Attention Augmentation as a primitive in automated architecture search procedures proves useful to find even better models than those previously found in image classification [55], object detection [12], image segmentation [6] and other domains[5, 1, ”
- Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detection (2020, methodology): “Recently, NAS-FPN (Ghiasi et al., 2019) and Auto-FPN (Xu et al., 2019) are proposed to automatically design cross-scale connections via neural architecture search.”
- AutoML: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art (2019, neutral): “Besides, some works are proposed to solve the task of object detection [141] and semantic segmentation [142], [143].”
- A Comprehensive Survey of Neural Architecture Search (2020, methodology): “With the improvement of NAS search efficiency, NAS is also quickly applied in the fields of object detection [65, 75, 111, 118], semantic segmentation [63, 64, 120], adversarial learning [53], architectural scaling [114, 122, 124], multi-objective optimization [39, 115, 125], platform-aware [28, 34,”
- Are Labels Necessary for Neural Architecture Search? (2020, background): “There are special focuses on reducing the overall time cost of the search process [19,24,20], or on extending to a larger variety of tasks [4,18,11,28].”
- Semi-Supervised Neural Architecture Search (2020, methodology): “Neural architecture search (NAS) for automatic architecture design has been successfully applied in several tasks including image classification and language modeling [42, 26, 6].”
- EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detection (2019, methodology): “Recently, NAS-FPN [5] employs neural architecture search to search for better cross-scale feature network topology, but it requires thousands of GPU hours during search and the found network is irregular and difficult to interpret or modify, as shown in Figure 2(c).”
- Memory-Efficient Hierarchical Neural Architecture Search for Image Denoising (2019, methodology): “Architectures automatically found by algorithms have achieved highly competitive performance in high-level vision tasks such as image classification [46], object detection [8, 36] and semantic segmentation [17, 29].”
- DARTS+: Improved Differentiable Architecture Search with Early Stopping (2019, methodology): “The neural architectures searched by NAS have achieved the state-of-the-art results over handcrafted neural architectures in various tasks, including object classification [4, 20, 21, 25, 26, 40], object detection [7, 36], semantic segmentation [19], recommender systems [14], etc.”
- DetNAS: Backbone Search for Object Detection (2019, background): “Recently, a NAS work on object detection, NAS-FPN [5], is proposed.”
- Evaluating the Search Phase of Neural Architecture Search (2019, methodology): “…optimiziation (Zhou et al., 2019) and performance predictors (Luo et al., 2018); 2) Exploiting NAS for other applications, e.g., object detection (Ghiasi et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2019), semantic segmentation (Liu et al., 2019a), and finding compact networks (Cai et al., 2018b; Wu et al., 2018;…”
- Auto-Keras: An Efficient Neural Architecture Search System (2018, neutral): “, image segmentation [28], object detection [16, 32], network analysis [20, 43].”
- Bottleneck Transformers for Visual Recognition (2021, methodology): “We consider the simplest and most widely used setting: ResNet-50 6 backbone with FPN 7 .”