Industrial Policies in Production Networks*

By Ernest Liu. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2019

188 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Many developing economies adopt industrial policies favoring selected sectors. Is there an economic logic to this type of intervention? I analyze industrial policy when economic sectors form a production network via input-output linkages. Market imperfections generate distortionary effects that compound through backward demand linkages, causing upstream sectors to become the sink for imperfections and have the greatest size distortions. My key finding is that the distortion in sectoral size is a sufficient statistic for the social value of promoting that sector; thus, there is an incentive for a well-meaning government to subsidize upstream sectors. Furthermore, sectoral interventions’ aggregate effects can be simply summarized, to first order, by the cross-sector covariance between my sufficient statistic and subsidy spending. My sufficient statistic predicts sectoral policies in South Korea in the 1970s and modern-day China, suggesting that sectoral interventions might have generated positive aggregate effects in these economies.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b52e0eef1109a591e11fc9ed54d546328d0a7ed1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Alireza Tahbaz-Salehi
  2. Yukiko U. Saito
  3. Vasco M. Carvalho
  4. Makoto Nirei
  5. Julien Sauvagnat
  6. Jean-Noël Barrot
  7. Michael Weber
  8. Andrew B. Bernard

Citations in the corpus