Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition : Psychological and Biological Models
By David E. Rumelhart, James L. McClelland. 1986
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Morten H. Christiansen
- N. Chater
- Brian Monroe
- Aaron Brownstein
- Yu Yang
- Stephen J. Read
- Lynn C. Miller
- Gurveen Chopra
Citations in the corpus
- Consequences of the Now-or-Never bottleneck for signed versus spoken languages (2015, background): “…but fling→ flung, wring→wrung; and even bring→ brought; with some verbs having the same present and past tense forms, e.g., cost→ cost, hit→ hit, split→ split; whereas others differ wildly, e.g., go→went; am→was; see, e.g., Bybee & Slobin 1982; Pinker & Prince 1988; Rumelhart & McClelland 1986).”
- A neural network model of the structure and dynamics of human personality. (2010, background): “…have three important components: the network architecture (how the nodes in the network are organized and connected, and how activation flows), the activation updating function for the nodes, and the learning rule for weights between nodes (Bechtel & Abrahamsen, 1991; McClelland & Rumelhart, 1986).”
- Doing without schema hierarchies: a recurrent connectionist approach to normal and impaired routine sequential action. (2004, unknown): “Connectionist or parallel distributed processing models (Rumelhart & McClelland, 1986) comprise a set of simple processing units, each carrying a scalar activation value.”
- Islands of Reliability for Regular Morphology: Evidence from Italian (2003, background): “In the course of the debate between connectionist models (Rumelhart and McClelland 1986; MacWhinney and Leinbach 1991) and the dual mechanism model of morphology (Pinker and Prince 1988; Pinker and Prince 1994), a substantial body of research has developed describing qualitative differences between…”
- Cognitive Perspectives in Psychology (2013, background): “Anderson (1990, chapter 1) provides a useful discussion of levels, including those of Chomsky (1965), Pylyshyn (1984), Rumelhart & McClelland (1986), and Newell (1982) in addition to Marr's and his own.”