Firth's logistic regression with rare events: accurate effect estimates and predictions?

By R. Puhr, Georg Heinze, Mariana Nold, Lara Lusa, A. Geroldinger. Statistics in Medicine, 2017

391 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Firth's logistic regression has become a standard approach for the analysis of binary outcomes with small samples. Whereas it reduces the bias in maximum likelihood estimates of coefficients, bias towards one‐half is introduced in the predicted probabilities. The stronger the imbalance of the outcome, the more severe is the bias in the predicted probabilities. We propose two simple modifications of Firth's logistic regression resulting in unbiased predicted probabilities. The first corrects the predicted probabilities by a post hoc adjustment of the intercept. The other is based on an alternative formulation of Firth's penalization as an iterative data augmentation procedure. Our suggested modification consists in introducing an indicator variable that distinguishes between original and pseudo‐observations in the augmented data. In a comprehensive simulation study, these approaches are compared with other attempts to improve predictions based on Firth's penalization and to other published penalization strategies intended for routine use. For instance, we consider a recently suggested compromise between maximum likelihood and Firth's logistic regression. Simulation results are scrutinized with regard to prediction and effect estimation. We find that both our suggested methods do not only give unbiased predicted probabilities but also improve the accuracy conditional on explanatory variables compared with Firth's penalization. While one method results in effect estimates identical to those of Firth's penalization, the other introduces some bias, but this is compensated by a decrease in the mean squared error. Finally, all methods considered are illustrated and compared for a study on arterial closure devices in minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b4f9f10c92de1200acc0d0c21871fab80663f850

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Sample size for binary logistic prediction models: Beyond events per variable criteria (2018, methodology): “Some more recent refinements to the Firth’s correction have shown promising results in circumventing the issues with calibration in the large.(21,48,58,59) With larger sample sizes, the benefits (in terms of predictive performance) of the regression shrinkage strategies gradually declined, but predi”