NEW SOLAR COMPOSITION: THE PROBLEM WITH SOLAR MODELS REVISITED

By A. Serenelli, S. Basu, J. Ferguson, Martin Asplund. 2009

337 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We construct updated solar models with different sets of solar abundances, including the most recent determinations by Asplund et al. The latter work predicts a larger (∼10%) solar metallicity compared to previous measurements by the same authors but significantly lower (∼25%) than the recommended value from a decade ago by Grevesse & Sauval. We compare the results of our models with determinations of the solar structure inferred through helioseismology measurements. The model that uses the most recent solar abundance determinations predicts the base of the solar convective envelope to be located at RCZ = 0.724 R☉ and a surface helium mass fraction of Ysurf = 0.231. These results are in conflict with helioseismology data (RCZ = 0.713 ± 0.001 R☉ and Ysurf = 0.2485 ± 0.0035) at 5σ and 11σ levels, respectively. Using the new solar abundances, we calculate the magnitude by which radiative opacities should be modified in order to restore agreement with helioseismology. We find that a maximum change of ∼15% at the base of the convective zone is required with a smooth decrease toward the core, where the change needed is ∼5%. The required change at the base of the convective envelope is about half the value estimated previously. We also present the solar neutrino fluxes predicted by the new models. The most important changes brought about by the new solar abundances are the increase by ∼10% in the predicted 13N and 15O fluxes that arise mostly due to the increase in the C and N abundances in the newly determined solar composition.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b4d5b45b9545898a99cdb802642609e38485cf5e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

Citations in the corpus

Updated global fit to three neutrino mixing: status of the hints of θ13 > 0 (2010, methodology): “the older solar abundances [30] leading to high metallicity, and one (labeled \AGS") assuming lower metallicity [34]. We use the most recent recalculation of the uxes in these two sets from Ref. [35], and following their notation we refer to them as GS98 and AGSS09. Let us rst consider the case”
Evidence of $\theta_{13}$>0 from global neutrino data analysis (2011, methodology): “For instance, we find that by using the standard solar model (SSM) inputs GS98 and AGSS09 from Table 3 of [30], the significance of the solar+KamLAND constraints on sin(2) θ13 changes by only ∼ 0.”
Improvements to stellar structure models, based on a grid of 3D convection simulations. II. Calibrating the mixing-length formulation (2014, background): “It is interesting to note that the dcz that results from our calibrated α is only a little deeper than the dcz = 0.276 R⊙ found by, e.g., Serenelli et al. (2009), from matching L⊙ and R⊙ of models based on the Asplund et al. (2009) abundances.”
Three-flavour neutrino oscillation update (2008, methodology): “ﬁts to neutrino oscillation data. Appendix A. Updated analysis as of February 2010 Appendix A.1. Updates in the solar neutrino analysis SSM: We consider the recently updated standard solar model from [35]. Among the diﬀerent models presented in that reference, we use the low metallicity model, label”
Solar constraints on hidden photons re-visited (2013, methodology): “Integrating the emission rate over the standard solar model AGSS09ph [23] (without expanding the exponential in the emission-rate formula), we find for the HP luminosity in the L-channel LSL = 5.”
Global fit to three neutrino mixing: critical look at present precision (2012, methodology): “ As discussed in detail in Ref. [67], and seen in the gure, the statistical signicance of this eect depends on the Standard Solar Model employed in the analysis, either the GS98 model or the AGSS09 [68]5 and, to lesser extend, on the capture cross-section in gallium employed6. As seen in the lower p”
Cool WISPs for stellar cooling excesses (2015, methodology): “The solar exclusion region is calculated by integrating the HP emission rate, both the transverse and longitudinal contributions, over the standard solar model [64] and selecting only the parameter space such that Lx ≤ 0.”
Neutrino Oscillations and Non-standard Interactions (2017, background): “Inside the Sun, Nu/Ne ' 2Nd/Ne ' 1 [55] and inside the Earth, Nu/Ne ' Nd/Ne ' 3 [107].”
SOLAR MODELS WITH ACCRETION. I. APPLICATION TO THE SOLAR ABUNDANCE PROBLEM (2011, methodology): “Consequently, the surface and central mass fractions of metals, ZS and ZC, and of helium, YS and YC, are also almost unchanged from those of Serenelli et al. (2009).”
Updated fit to three neutrino mixing: status of leptonic CP violation (2014, methodology): “For the sake of completeness the solar neutrino results are shown for two different versions of the Standard Solar Model, namely the GS98 and the AGSS09 models [29].”
Ages and fundamental properties of Kepler exoplanet host stars from asteroseismology (2015, result): “…the solar atmosphere are much more realistic than the simple 1D atmospheres used by Grevesse & Sauval (1998), their results are not in agreement with the helioseismic determinations of the solar internal structure (e.g., Basu & Antia 2008; Christensen-Dalsgaard et al. 2009; Serenelli et al. 2009).”
NuFit-6.0: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations (2024, neutral): “Consequently, two different sets of Standard Solar Models were built, each based on the corresponding set of solar abundances [48–50].”
The FIP and Inverse FIP Effects in Solar and Stellar Coronae (2015, background): “Other authors have suggested that increased opacity (Christensen-Dalsgaard et al., 2009; Serenelli et al., 2009), beyond that implied by the increase due to data from the Opacity Project replacing older OPAL radiative opacities (Bahcall et al.”
MESA ISOCHRONES AND STELLAR TRACKS (MIST). I. SOLAR-SCALED MODELS (2016, methodology): “One resolution invokes increased opacity, an idea that has been quantitatively explored by several authors (e.g., Bahcall et al. 2005a; Christensen-Dalsgaard et al. 2009; Serenelli et al. 2009).”
New axion and hidden photon constraints from a solar data global fit (2015, methodology): “The total theoretical error for Q is found by combining in quadrature all the input error contributions (see [37] and [59] for details):”