Artificial light puts ecosystem services of frugivorous bats at risk
By Daniel Lewanzik, C. Voigt. 2014
141 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b4c08574e0ee9dda2ed1060a393caa5add26772c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Gareth J. F. Jones
- S. Harris
- R. Winfree
- Tina Harrison
- Kevin J. Gaston
- Thomas W. Davies
- E. Stone
- Daniel Lewanzik
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Tina Harrison
- Gareth J. F. Jones
- S. Harris
- R. Winfree
- Thomas W. Davies
- E. Stone
- Kevin J. Gaston
- Daniel Lewanzik
In Global and Planetary Change
- Tina Harrison
- R. Winfree
- Thomas W. Davies
- E. Stone
- Gareth J. F. Jones
- Kevin J. Gaston
- S. Harris
- Daniel Lewanzik
Citations in the corpus
- ECOLOGY OF ORGANISMS IN URBAN ENVIRONMENTS Urban drivers of plant-pollinator interactions (2015, background): “The effects of light on pollination by nocturnal vertebrates are unknown, but are likely affected by light-avoidance behaviours, as demonstrated in seeddispersing bats (Lewanzik & Voigt 2014).”
- Dark Matters: The Effects of Artificial Lighting on Bats (2016, background): “bat-mediated seed intake is particularly important during the early stages of succession (Medellin and Gaona 1999; Muscarella and Fleming 2007), light pollution might slow down the reforestation of cleared rainforests (Lewanzik and Voigt 2014).”
- Ecological effects of artificial light at night on wild plants (2016, background): “Light can act as a barrier to movement for many species of bats (Stone, Jones & Harris 2009, 2012), effectively fragmenting landscapes and potentially acting as a barrier for gene flow or dispersal in plants (Lewanzik & Voigt 2014).”