Prospect Theory in Political Science: Gains and Losses From the First Decade

By Rose McDermott. 2004

224 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b4b1941bdba674be1a1e67457f451807c4b89ab3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. E. Hafner-Burton
2. Ernst Fehr
3. John A. List
4. David G. Victor
5. Barbara Vis
6. H. Kim
7. K. Sikkink
8. Evgeny Postnikov

In Safety Research

1. John A. List
2. Ernst Fehr
3. Barbara Vis
4. Armin Falk
5. Simon Gächter
6. Jeffrey P. Carpenter
7. Benedikt Herrmann
8. Imran Rasul

In Sociology and Political Science

1. John A. List
2. Ernst Fehr
3. E. Hafner-Burton
4. David G. Victor
5. Barbara Vis
6. Simon Gächter
7. Jeffrey P. Carpenter
8. Benedikt Herrmann

Citations in the corpus

• Governments and unpopular social policy reform: Biting the bullet or steering clear? (2009, background): “, losses) (for recent reviews of prospect theory in political science, see Levy 2003; McDermott 2004; Mercer 2005).”
• The Cognitive Revolution and the Political Psychology of Elite Decision Making (2013, background): “34 McDermott 2004a; McDermott, Fowler and Smirnov 2008.”