Online-Syntax
By Peter Auer. 2009
225 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract One fundamental difference between spoken and written language has to do with the ‘linearity’ of speaking in time, in that the temporal structure of speaking is inherently the outcome of an interactive process between speaker and listener. But despite the status of “linearity” as one of Saussure’s fundamental principles, in practice little more than lip-service is paid to the temporality of spoken language, which is treated as having few if any consequences for syntactic analysis. It is trivial to point out that a structuralist definition of the sentence is incompatible with an on-line model of syntax processing. A structuralist analysis, even of ostensibly spoken language, is carried out not from a real-time emergence perspective but as if it were – like a written text – a finished product. This article suggests that a significantly untraditional approach to syntax is required when one focuses on its on-line emergence, and outlines such an approach.
Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Philosophy
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b4ae3ae9668616a6fdc9d6412ebecaeada7edf89
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Language and Linguistics
In Philosophy
Citations in the corpus
- The Interdependence of Bodily Demonstrations and Clausal Syntax (2013, background): “Furthermore, interactional units are always negotiable and flexible at the end; they can be recompleted (Auer, 1992, 2009; Couper-Kuhlen & Ono, 2007).”