Traveling to Violence: The Case for a Mobility-Based Spatial Typology of Homicide

By George E. Tita, E. Griffiths. 2005

132 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Epidemiology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b4ada6a8e50478609888494cf9872a7dc3fed831

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Epidemiology

1. Jerry H. Ratcliffe
2. George E. Tita
3. R. Tewksbury
4. Martin A. Andresen

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Lyndsay N. Boggess
2. Eric S. Mccord
3. John R. Hipp
4. Jerry H. Ratcliffe
5. George E. Tita
6. G. Duwe
7. W. Donnay
8. R. Tewksbury

Citations in the corpus

• A Micro-Spatial Analysis of the Demographic and Criminogenic Environment of Drug Markets in Philadelphia (2007, background): “However, what is common to many studies is that even when individual address data are available, the need to explore census variables necessitates aggregation to the census tract or block group level (for example Tita & Griffiths, 2005).”
• INTERGROUP AND INTRAGROUP VIOLENCE: IS VIOLENT CRIME AN EXPRESSION OF GROUP CONFLICT OR SOCIAL DISORGANIZATION?* (2009, background): “Typical mobility patterns will almost certainly expose one to criminal events as either the victim travels, or the offender forages, into nearby neighborhoods (Tita and Griffiths, 2005).”
• Does Residential Proximity Matter? A Geographic Analysis of Sex Offense Recidivism (2008, background): “In addition, Tita and Griffiths (2005) showed that across 9 years of homicides in Pittsburgh, homicide offenders rarely killed in their own neighborhoods.”