The relationship between visual enclosure for neighbourhood street walkability and elders’ mental health in China: Using street view images

By Ruoyu Wang, Yi Lu, Jinbao Zhang, Penghua Liu, Yao Yao, Ye Liu. Journal of Transport and Health, 2019

190 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Background Neighbourhood walkability has been consistently associated with more physical activities in adults. Nevertheless, evidence of a beneficial association between walkability and older adults’ mental health is still scarce in developing countries. Furthermore, walkability was often measured through Geographic Information System (GIS) methods. Recently, the methodological development in street view images, such as using Google or Tencent Street View, has offered an attractive alternative. Methods Using Tencent street view images and machine learning classification methods, we quantify visual enclosure for neighbourhood street walkability with the proportion of visible sky in those images. Depression and anxiety data were extracted from mental health surveys for 1231 older adults in Beijing, China in 2011. Multilevel linear regression models were used to assess the associations. Results Street walkability was negatively associated with Geriatric Depression Scale scores (GDS 15-item) and Geriatric Anxiety Inventory scores (GAI 20-item), and the results of different robustness checks also support this relationship. The associations were stronger for disadvantaged older adults than others. Conclusion The present study indicates a potential beneficial role of street walkability on mental health (depression and anxiety) in older residents, especially for disadvantaged older adults. Additional longitudinal studies are required to address some limitations of this study, such as residential self-selection bias.

Subfields: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b4a074f99d96e94792b67086ce028c91536f1089

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

  1. Koichi Ito
  2. Filip Biljecki

Citations in the corpus