Watershed Partnerships and the Emergence of Collective Action Institutions

By Mark Lubell, Mark Schneider, John T. Scholz, M. Mete. 2002

556 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b49846481109a5122a90f48737c4eac9cb3172d5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

Connecting social networks with ecosystem services for watershed governance: a social-ecological network perspective highlights the critical role of bridging organizations. (2012, background): “…between social network structure and various criteria of management success (Provan and Milward 2001, Sandström and Carlsson 2008, Scholz et al. 2008), there has been less attention paid to how the ecological context of social networks shapes their form (Pahl-Wostl 2009, Lubell et al. 2002).”
Rational Choice and Regional Governance (2007, background): “Although they focused on estuaries rather than metropolitan areas, Lubell et al. (2002) provided insights into how barriers to institutional collective action can be reduced.”
Voluntary agreements to improve environmental quality: symbolic and substantive cooperation (2009, methodology): “Several researchers have used the scores of the League of Conservation Voters as a measure of the elected representatives’ preferences of a state (Delmas, Russo, and Montes-Sancho, 2007; Hamilton, 1997; Kassinis and Vafeas, 2002, 2006; Lubell et al., 2002; Viscusi and Hamilton, 1999).”
City Adoption of Environmentally Sustainable Policies in California's Central Valley (2009, methodology): “Two of the authors have also used community characteristics as proxies for interest group constituencies in other work ( Lubell, Feiock, & Ramirez, 2005 ; Lubell, Schneider, Scholz, & Mete, 2002 ).”
Local Institutions and the Politics of Urban Growth (2009, background): “Lubell et al. (2002) also use community characteristics as proxies for interest group constituencies.”
Payments for environmental services in watersheds: Insights from a comparative study of three cases in Central America (2007, background): “In those cases, downstream water pollution (or scarcity) is the result of the combination of individual actions carried out by geographically spread and heterogeneous upstream users (Lubell et al., 2002).”
US State Policies for Renewable Energy: Context and Effectiveness (2011, methodology): “League of Conservation Voters Several researchers have used the scores of the League of Conservation Voters as a measure of the preferences of the elected representatives of a state (Delmas et al., 2007; Hamilton, 1997; Kassinis and Vafeas, 2002, 2006; Lubell et al., 2002; Viscusi and Hamilton, 1999”
Competition and Cooperation: Local Government Joint Ventures for Economic Development (2010, background): “It is hypothesized that policy networks that have a higher density score improves information flow and provides an enforcement mechanism to fulfill a cooperative agreement (Lubell et al., 2002).”
Improving the link between payments and the provision of ecosystem services in agri-environment schemes (2014, unknown): “2 www.sustainableuplands.org If land managers do not perceive these benefits they will not cooperate, regardless of which benefits may ‘objectively’ exist (Lubell et al. 2002).”
Governing Institutional Complexity: The Ecology of Games Framework (2013, unknown): “Conceptually, transaction cost theory (Lubell et al., 2002; North, 1990; Williamson, 1985) has some relevance to this question because the overall EG in a particular geographical area defines the benefits and transaction costs of solving the underlying policy issues.”
Political Institutions and Conservation by Local Governments (2005, background): “…a “political market” theory of policy change that combines political economy theories of property rights (Libecap 1989; Eggertsson 1990; Alston 1996; Lubell et al. 2002) with the interest group framework by focusing on how the influences of these factors areconditionalon thestructureof…”
Competitors and Cooperators: A Micro-Level Analysis of Regional Economic Development Collaboration Networks (2012, background): “…by mitigating collective action problems as well as capturing a greater advantage from collaborative problem solving (Agranoff and McGuire 2003; Lubell et al. 2002; Meier and O’Toole 2002; Provan and Milward 2001). number of local jurisdictions increases, particularly in metropolitan areas.”