Modeling non-CO2 Greenhouse Gas Abatement

By R. Hyman, J. Reilly, M. Babiker, A. De Masin, H. Jacoby. 2003

185 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b48e5bfeab3c1a82b6a1c5b2b09ce27c874a6be0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

Computable general equilibrium models for sustainability impact assessment: Status quo and prospects (2006, methodology): “To introduce GHG control, the production function is parameterized in consistence with technological based marginal abatement cost curves of control options (Hyman et al., 2003).”
Air pollution policy in Europe: Quantifying the interaction with greenhouse gases and climate change policies (2014, background): “Hyman et al. (2002) introduce emissions as an input to the production function, placed at the top of the nested production structure.”
Issues related to mitigation in the long-term context (2007, methodology): “However, the novel mitigation technologies represented in agricultural MACs require the use of techniques like those employed for modeling non-CO2 GHG mitigation for energy and industry sectors (Hyman et al., 2003).”
The Opportunity Cost of Land Use and the Global Potential for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in Agriculture and Forestry (2006, methodology): “…enteric and manure emissions (Chapter 5, USEPA, 2006).5 Since we have tied the emissions to explicit economic drivers, we are able to employ a more refined approach than that used by Hyman et al. (2003) for industrial emissions, which simply ties all emissions and mitigation to output levels.”
The cost of climate policy in the United States (2009, background): “More detail on how abatement costs are represented for these substances is provided in Hyman et al. (2003).”
Assessment of U.S. Cap-and-Trade Proposals (2007, unknown): “More detail on how abatement costs are represented for these substances is provided in Hyman et al. (2003).”
Long-term reduction potential of non-CO2 greenhouse gases (2007, background): “…(Blok et al., 2001; Harmelink et al., 2005; US-EPA, 1999); (2) an increase in the flexibility in abatement options (Hayhoe et al., 1999; Hyman et al., 2002; Jensen and Thelle, 2001; Lucas et al., 2005; Manne and Richels, 2001; Reilly et al., 1999; Tol, 1999; Van Vuuren et al., 2003);…”
Distributional Impacts of Carbon Pricing: A General Equilibrium Approach with Micro-Data for Households (2011, unknown): “Environmental Protection Agency (2009) inventory data, including endogenous costing of the abatement of non-CO2 greenhouse gases (Hyman et al., 2002).”